<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Default entry point]]></title>
    <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent</link>
    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:14:58 +0200</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:14:58 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Other Users Can See Demoted Ideas]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/40/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Anyone with an account can log in, click on a user's name and view ideas that that particular user has promoted/demoted.  This decreases the level of anonymity that some might prefer, and may cause conflicts if one user sees that another has demoted his/her idea.  <br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Add Setting to Show/Hide Ideas Promoted/Demoted</b>
<br />

Users should have the option of allowing others to see the ideas that they have promoted/demoted.  In each users dashboard there could be an option to show/hide ideas that he/she has promoted or demoted.  I suggest that the options be independent for promoted and demoted.  That way the user can choose to show one and hide the other, show both or hide both.  Anonymity may promote more honesty.  <br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:08:35 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/40/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Allow Editing Title Before Moderator Approval]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/39/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Currently only the Idea Rational Description can be edited before an idea receives approval.  I submitted an idea on a site's IdeaTorrent and later regretted the title that I chose.  <br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Change the "Title" field to be editable</b>
<br />

Just allow idea submitters to edit the title of their idea while it is waiting for approval.  <br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:55:07 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/39/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Name Change may increase appeal]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/38/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Great idea !. I have thought about a similar concept and I really believe in the utility of a service like this. I think it could be implemented more and I really feel like it should.<br /><br />But I think the name is a little obstructive. I think too many people have too specific connotations they associate with the word torrent. I see the idea of having a stream or torrent as a visual canvas for what this service does.<br /><br />But I think it could maybe a little better. <br /><br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: New Name</b>
<br />

Here are some completely top of the head suggestions for possible inspiration.<br /><br />* IdeaStream<br />* TideIdea<br />* VoteIdea<br />* Vodea<br />* Ideaflow<br />* Idealize<br />* IdeaTip<br />* IdeaMotion<br />* BrightIdea<br />* Hunch<br />* KeyIdea<br />* Ideakey<br />* IdeaMix<br />* IdeaAim<br />* IdeaSpunk<br />* IdeaTweak<br />* IdeaLeap<br />* ClearIdea<br />* IdeaBead<br />* IdeaReam<br />* ClearIdea<br /><br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:12:46 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/38/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Don't show "Idea Sandbox" to normal users]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/37/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Don't show "Idea Sandbox" to normal users, just moderators. <br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Filter "Idea Sandbox" so that it is showed only to moderators</b>
<br />

Filter "Idea Sandbox" so that it is showed only to moderators<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #2: Normal Users May Be Inclined to Return for Ideas from Sandbox</b>
<br />

I think that normal users should be able to see the sandbox.  If they find an idea in there that they like, they may keep returning to check if that specific idea has been approved so they can vote on it.  I just think it allows ideas to be better advertised.  Chances are more users will contribute to ideas if they can see it as soon as it is submitted.  <br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:05:52 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/37/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Ineffective implementation management]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/36/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[As I scroll through Ubuntu Brainstorm, I see lots of solutions which are already implemented, but since they're not marked as implemented, they are still being discussed, voted for etc. - they simply waste effort of the community.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Implement solutions, solve rationale</b>
<br />

First of all, that's the most natural way. People implement solutions to solve the problem described in ideas rationale. When enough solutions are implemented, the problem is solved. Second, it solves the effort wasting problem.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 22:30:48 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/36/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] IdeaTorrent sites are separate from the rest of the web]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/35/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[People want to share their ideas, tell their friends about them. <br /><br />Projects want people to discuss the ideas, post new solutions and vote on the suggestions.<br /><br />It would be nice to have some mechanism to suck users in from other places when ideas are posted or voted on.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Add semantics using microformats and RSS feeds</b>
<br />

XFN's identity tag can be used to declare ownership of a profile page, a rel=me link (or rel="nofollow me" to thwart spammers) back to the user's home page would declare ownership of the page. rel="me" links between sub-pages of the profile would allow all pages to become one big profile. <br /><br />http://gmpg.org/xfn/11<br /><br />Then provide an Atom and/or RSS feed on each user page (comments, problems, solutions, ++votes, --votes) which can be followed by visitors. Atom would be best as it has author tags.<br /><br />This information could then be fed into social networking and aggregating tools  like Google Buzz, Facebook, Twitter, Google Reader and so on.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 06:40:52 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/35/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Tags automatically removed.]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/34/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It looks like any kind of tags entered are automatically removed; I wanted to insert some XML into the Notepad++ IdeaTorrent, as an example on how to improve their syntax highlighting system, however IdeaTorrent swallowed it up, meaning I had to manually enter their HTML entities.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Convert tags to HTML entities</b>
<br />

I suggest converting all ampersands into &amp;amp; and &lt; and &gt; converted into their HTML entities &amp;lt; and &amp;gt; to prevent display errors.<br /><br />Additionally, any future versions should check for current entries from old versions where people have used HTML entities to bypass this, and convert them accordingly to prevent display errors.<br /><br />Additionally, some further syntax to allow for specific formatting (i.e. bold, italic tags, code tags, etc.) would be welcomed, as they could be used to better display text.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:01:37 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/34/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Fast enetering of ideas: 5 minutes waiting problem or import/export]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/33/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There is urgent need to import thousands of ideas from ideas campaign<br /><br />or to put hundreds manually.<br /><br />If trying to type manually I (administrator) can't do this fast, because even admin has no right to do this without 5 minutes interval<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: To make 5 minutes interval as option</b>
<br />

.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #2: To make clear import/export option</b>
<br />

.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:56:41 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/33/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] I want to have easier instruction]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/32/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[This is basically a test to see how this works<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: video instructional</b>
<br />

I think a video instructional may resolve this from happening<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:52:41 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/32/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Intergrated Text Formating/Linking]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/31/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When using idea torrent its hard to use proper formatting, hyperlinks, images and other media.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Intergrate Text Formating/Linking</b>
<br />

This should be implemented in the comments section and rational/solution description. Most forums have this feature, IdeaTorrent should have it too. <br /><br />If you don't know what I am talking about have a look at posting on forums, like the ubuntu forums. When you post you have options above the text box to add links, images and format text (bold, lists, etc...).<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:35:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/31/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] It is difficult for users to evaluate Idea Torrent ]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/30/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<br />It is not trivial to set up Idea Torrent.<br /><br /><br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Provide a Virtual Machine of Idea Torrent</b>
<br />

It would be nice to download a working virtual machine (VirtualBox and similar)  of a complete Idea Torrent server.  <br /><br />The virtual machine would contain the SQL server, Drupal installation, and a default Idea Torrent configuration.  <br /><br />This would be useful for people to quickly evaluate the software, and perhaps, even allow users to run it in production.  <br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:09:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/30/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[2] Tabled Ideas]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/29/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[What to do with ideas that have been reviewed, discussed, and decided to NOT implement.<br />
<br />



<b>[2 votes] Solution #1: Create tabled ideas classification</b>
<br />

Just the currently implemented classes on this ideatorrent are 'popular', 'ideas in development', and 'implemented ideas'. This would create a new class called 'tabled ideas'. This would be to weed out ideas that won't be implemented for whatever reason but not just delete them. The ideas could then be moved back out into the regular population at some future point as well.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:44:32 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/29/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[2] Allow comments on solutions (not just ideas)]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/28/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Sometimes you want to comment on a specific solution. As far as I know, the only way to do this now is to mention a solution when commenting on the idea.<br />
<br />



<b>[2 votes] Solution #1: Add a comments section below each solution</b>
<br />

On the idea page (where you can see comments and add your own), show a comments section beneath each solution. The comments section starts collapsed, saying "4 comments on this solution" and possibly "add a comment". These links expand the solution's comments section, showing the comments and allowing you to add one.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:29:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/28/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Limit the Number of Votes for Users]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/27/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In order to allow a better priorisation in a closed community it is better to limit the number of votes each user has, so she really picks only the most important problems. It would also be good to be able to add 1-3 votes per user.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Give Users a Vote budget</b>
<br />

Each user can optionally be limited by a group setting to number of votes she has available. She can always remove votes from one idea to move them to others, or she gets them back once an idea is implemented. It is good to give 1-3 votes to an idea. A method to granting bonus votes to users is also a needed addition.<br /><br />This can also be used to limit suggestions a user can make, if he always has to give at least one vote to his own initial ideas.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #2: Solution #1, but you vote for a problem, not a solution</b>
<br />

This may be what solution #1 was saying; it wasn't entirely clear to me.<br /><br />Give users "priority votes" or something that they can use to say which problem they think is the highest priority. Each user has a limited number of priority votes as in solution #1. These votes are different from the unlimited votes you can make on solutions.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:21:15 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/27/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Reuse Search Title]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/26/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In the "Search duplicate" step you have to type a title and then if no match is found, you have to type it again. <br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Reuse Search Title </b>
<br />

Competitors use the given title and you can change it on create step.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:15:54 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/26/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Voting on an Idea is not the best way to Rank problems]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/25/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Since a user can only vote on Ideas, he cannot make a problem (with no good solution) obvious. Also requiring the submitter to specify an idea is somewhat a showstopper.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Vote on Problems</b>
<br />

I would suggest users can vote on the missing features/rationales independend from the Solution _and_ if a user only votes on a solution it is also a vote for the problem. This way a rational with 1 Ideas (each 10 votes) has at least 20 votes in comparision to other rationales with 1 idea and 15 votes.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:13:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/25/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Nb. of ideas in titles]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/24/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Wouldn't it be nice if the interface told you how many ideas there were in the "Popular Ideas", "Ideas in development" and "Implemented Ideas" area ?<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Dynamic title per category</b>
<br />

Wouldn't it be nice if the interface told you how many ideas there were in the "Popular Ideas", "Ideas in development" and "Implemented Ideas" area ?<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:31:06 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/24/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Remove or restrict spam comments from ideatorrent.org]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/23/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I've noticed that ideatorrent.org seems to have the odd spam comment (a post containing links to hundreds of other sites).  See http://ideatorrent.org/node/127#comment-59 for an example.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Install Mollom or an equivalent module or use comment moderation </b>
<br />

There are any number of solutions to this problem including turning off anonymous comment publishing, using the captcha module or using a service like Mollom to control the comments.<br /><br />A quick solution would be to allow visitors to report spam comments.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:32:46 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/23/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Geomaping your idea]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/22/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It would be great to have ideas able to have a tag on a map. This would be nice for municipalities to use it and have and citizens site for entering problems and finding solutions.<br /><br />Check this out (outdated) to see what I mean exactly.<br /><br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Create a google map addon</b>
<br />

A special google map page with marks to the respected posts would be nice<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:30:33 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/22/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Save Replacings in Notepad++]]></title>
      <link>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/21/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Save the different entered expressions in "Replace", Raplacing e.g. if you work with regular expressions. And then define a shortkey for them, so you can apply the different replacings very easy and productive. Would be very cool !<br /><br />Thanks, <br />Furtano<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Implement :)</b>
<br />

Dont know :P<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:34:20 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://pidgin.ideatorrent.org/ideatorrent/idea/21/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

